自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
 

中南大学学报(社会科学版)
ZHONGNAN DAXUE XUEBAO(SHEHUI KEXUE BAN)

2017年11月第23卷第6期
   
本文已被:浏览1627次    下载887次   
文章编号:1672-3104(2017)06-0131-07
 
超越“结构性自主”:中国社会组织发展的“内在性自主”导向及启示
 
曾琰
 
(华东政法大学马克思主义学院,上海,201620)
 
摘  要: “结构性自主”思维秉持着“独立-自主”同一性逻辑、政治权力制约的意义指向、外在性的问题归因取向,以此来审视中国社会组织发展的自主性问题,这种思维取向无法正确解释中国社会组织发展的自主性。“内在性自主”客观地呈现了社会组织根据特定情境采取灵活、自主的行动策略来应对既定制度环境的能力,这种自主性表现为“在独立性与自主性之间”的“结构-行动”反应、对“不同制度生产者”效应的政策性应对、“生活消解制度”的行动者微观权力生产。从“结构性自主”到“内在性自主”,有利于我们在价值反思中真正推动社会组织的发展。
 
关键词: 结构性自主;内在性自主;社会组织;“国家-社会”
 
 
Transcending “structural autonomy”: The development of social organizations under the guidance of internality and its enlightenments
 
Zeng Yan
 
(School of Marxism, East China University of Political Science and Law, shanghai 201620, China)
 
Abstract: “Structural autonomy” thinking upholds the “independence-autonomy” identity logic, significance pointing within restraints of political power and the external problem of attribution orientation to examine the autonomy of development of China's social organization. Such thinking, however, cannot explain correctly the autonomy of the development of Chinese social organizations. “Intrinsic autonomy” presents objectively the ability of social organizations to adopt flexible and autonomous action strategies to deal with the established institutional environment according to specific circumstances. This autonomy is manifested as “structure-action” response between “independence and autonomy,” policy response to the “different system producers” effect and actors' micro- power production in “life digestion system.” Transcending “structural autonomy” to “intrinsic autonomy” is helpful for us to really promote the development of social organization in value reflection.
 
Key words: structural autonomy; intrinsic autonomy; autonomy; social organization; “stat-society”
 
 
版权所有:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部 
地 址:湖南省长沙市岳麓区麓山南路932号     邮编: 410083
电 话: 0731-88830141
电子邮箱: znsk@csu.edu.cn 湘ICP备09001153号-4