|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2013)01-0093-07 |
| |
|
“醉驾型”危险驾驶罪之主观罪过研究 |
| |
徐苗 |
| |
|
（北京师范大学法学院，北京，100875） |
| |
| 摘 要： “醉驾型”危险驾驶罪之主观罪过为故意，即明知自己饮酒后不能安全驾驶机动车而依然驾驶，对公共安全法益受侵害的危险性持希望或放任的态度。除非确证行为人出于报复社会的动机，否则一般意义上的醉驾不属于以危险方法危害公共安全罪之“其他危险方法”的范畴，行为人故意“醉驾”的不成立以危险方法危害公共安全罪，这是认定本罪主观罪过为故意而非过失的逻辑前提。作为抽象危险犯，“醉驾型”危险驾驶罪间接故意认定复杂，尤其是其意欲因素的质与量往往与自信过失交织在一起，难以区分。为此，提出拟制的间接故意概念，即根据“醉驾”造成法益侵害危险的盖然性，只要行为人对醉驾有认识，就推定行为人对法益侵害的危险性持放任态度，从而认定间接故意。 |
| |
| 关键词： 危险驾驶罪；醉酒驾车；故意；拟制的间接故意 |
| |
|
| |
On subjective fault of Drunken Driving potential damage offense |
| |
XU Miao |
| |
（School of Law, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The subjective fault of drunken driving potential damage offense was intentional, including a direct intentional and indirect intention. If we don’t corroborate the perpetrator’s motive for revenge on society, otherwise the general sense of drunk driving did not constitute the dangerous method harm of public security crime. This was the logical premise that correctly identified the crime of intentional and negligent. As abstract Potential Damage Offense, it was quite complex and difficult to identify indirect intentional and overconfident fault. Therefore, this paper puts forward a new concept which is “legal presumption of indirect intentional”. According to the “drunk driving” caused by the legal interests infringed dangerous probability, as long as the perpetrator had drunk driving awareness, it could be assumed that the perpetrator was driving with the laissez-faire attitude. |
| |
Key words: crime of dangerous driving; drunken driving; intention; fiction of indirect intentional |
| |
|
