|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2012)03-0200-04 |
| |
|
六朝“引”体考辨
--以《文心雕龙》为中心 |
| |
郑伟 |
| |
|
（南京大学文学院，江苏南京，210093） |
| |
| 摘 要： 《文心雕龙·论说篇》之“序”“引”是否为同一文体，曾经引发海内外文论家的关注。诸家常为“引”体“别成一体”张目，但由于论据没有效力，其结论不能成立。其实，“引”与“序”在六朝时期本是互为代称的同一文体。结合《文心雕龙》“序引”的文体阐释与陆云《与兄平原书》“引”体的叙述语境，六朝“引”体与史传文学密切相关，其文体内涵指向史书列传篇首之“序论”。“序论”在“次事”之外兼又“析理”，故而刘勰《文心雕龙》将“序引”列入 “论”体。“引”与“序”在六朝以后发生了文体衍变，“引”体的“随依性”增强，并与诗赋之“序”的文体同一性更为紧 密。 |
| |
| 关键词： 六朝；“引”体；“序”体；序论；《文心雕龙》；《与兄平原书》 |
| |
|
| |
Study on a Literary Form of “Yin”: Taking Win Xin Diao Long as the Center |
| |
ZHENG Wei |
| |
（Nanjing University, School of Literature, Nanjing 210093, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Whether “Yin” and “Xu” in Win Xin Diao Long is the same kind of style or not has caused the attention at home and abroad. Many critics often argue that the two literary froms are of the different kinds of style, but because the arguments had no effect, the conclusion could not be established. In fact, “Yin” and “Xu” in the Six Dynasties they were of the same style. Through the stylistic interpretation of Wen xin diao long and narrative context of “Yin” in Lu Yun’s Letters to his Lu Ji his brother, “Yin” in the Six Dynasties closely related to the historical and biographical literature, its stylistic meaning point to “Xu Lun” in historical biographies. It has both the narration and comment, so Liu Xie’s Wen Xin Diao long put it in the “remarks” style. “Yin” and “Xu” stylisticly evolutived after the Tang and Song Dynasties, their stylistic dependence became stronger and the identity of two literary forms became more closely. |
| |
Key words: The Six Dynasties; A literary form of “Yin”; A literary form of “Xu”; “Xu Lun”; Win Xin Diao Long; Letters to his brother Lu Ji |
| |
|
