|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2012)01-0067-08 |
| |
|
司法能力主义：对司法克制主义和司法能动主义的平衡 |
| |
聂长建，景春兰 |
| |
|
（中南民族大学法学院，湖北武汉，430073；东莞理工学院政法学院，广东东莞，523808） |
| |
| 摘 要： 司法克制主义坚持严格的规则主义，有利于维护法律的确定性，但走向极端化就会损害个案正义，忽视司法判决的正确性。司法能动主义通过法律原则的适用维护个案正义和司法判决的正确性，但走向极端化就会破坏法律的确定性。现代法律和司法判决应该是正确性和确定性的统一，这就提出了司法能力主义，也就是对司法克制主义和司法能动主义两种对立的意识形态进行“执两用中”的整合和平衡。司法能力主义强调法律不仅是技术，亦是艺术，对法官的司法能力提出很高要求。 |
| |
| 关键词： 司法能力主义；司法克制主义；司法能动主义；平衡 |
| |
|
| |
Judicial Meritocracy: The equilibrium between judicial restraint and judicial activism |
| |
NIE Changjian, JING Chunlan |
| |
（Law School of Zhongnan Minzu University, Wuhan 430073, China;
School of Political Science and Law, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Judicial restraint insists on the strict regulation, and avails to the legal certainty, but it will harm the case just and ignore the correctness of judicial judgment if it goes to extreme. Judicial activism maintains the case just and the correctness of judicial judgment by legal principle, but it will ruin the legal certainty if it goes to extreme. The modern law and judicial judgment is the unitary between correctness and certainty, and that is judicial meritocracy, that the equilibrium between judicial restraint and judicial activism by balancing the two while using the middle. Judicial meritocracy emphasizes that it is not only technology but also art, which gives higher requirement to judicial capacity for judge. |
| |
Key words: judicial meritocracy; judicial restraint; judicial activism; equilibrium |
| |
|
