|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2011)01-0139-04 |
| |
|
韩礼德语境思想与文学批评 |
| |
徐杰, 赵中华 |
| |
|
（浙江大学人文学院，浙江杭州，310028） |
| |
| 摘 要： 从传统社会历史批评到形式主义文论，从文化研究到“后理论”时代的“新审美主义”，文学研究始终处于一种内部和外部研究的“钟摆”状态下。它们都为文学的阐释提供了各自的可能性，却长期处于非此即彼的对立状态，究其根源在于以索绪尔形式语言思想作为文学研究的理论基础的不适恰性——抽象的语言体系与文学诗性语言之间的“溶血”现象。韩礼德的语境思想能为解决文学内外的裂隙提供一种语言上的思路，因为他的语言思想既重视语言外部语境对语言形式的影响，又强调研究语言形式内部自身的规律，让人们能清晰地洞悉外部经验世界作用于文本内部世界的机制，从而为文学寻求更合理的研究方法提供了一种新的语言思想。 |
| |
| 关键词： 社会历史批评；形式主义批评；文化研究；“后理论时代”；韩礼德；语境 |
| |
|
| |
Halliday’s Context Theory and The “Pendulum”of Literary Criticism |
| |
XU Jie |
| |
（Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The differences between the social and historical criticism and formal criticism has existed for a long time. Can the external and internal research of literature be combined? The social and historical criticism plays an important role in literary study, with limitations. From Halliday’s theory about language, we find that Halliday did a systematic exposition about internal and external links of the text. He proposes the correspondence in context level, semantic level and formal level, discovering the relations between the external world and the internal world in text clearly, and bringing forward a new social language of criticism which is different from traditional criticism. |
| |
Key words: Social and Historical criticism; Formalism; Cultural studies; "Post-theoretic Era"; Halliday; Contextual Paradigm |
| |
|
