|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2010)05-0053-05 |
| |
|
反垄断法的豁免——中国的视角和选择 |
| |
应品广 |
| |
|
（华东政法大学，上海，200042） |
| |
| 摘 要： 反垄断法在我国经济领域中的适用范围应该有多大，已经是摆在我国竞争执法机构面前的重大现实问题。对比各国反垄断法对经济领域覆盖的“统一适用、例外豁免”模式和“有限适用”模式，我国更宜采用前者。在具体的豁免内容上，则应重点关注行业豁免问题。对于可以采取法定豁免的内容，应该通过立法或者指南的方式予以明确；对于可以采取个案豁免的内容，则应根据“合理原则”进行个案的“公益性”分析。豁免的范围还应随着时间和条件的变化而做相应改变，并朝着逐步缩小豁免范围的方向而努力。 |
| |
| 关键词： 反垄断法；适用范围；豁免；个案豁免；法定豁免 |
| |
|
| |
The immunity of the Anti-monopoly Law:
a perspective and choice of China |
| |
YING Pinguang |
| |
（East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China） |
| |
| Abstract: In what scope the Anti-monopoly Law should be applied in China’s economic field has been a major problem placed in front of the competition law enforcement agencies. Comparing the “uniform application but limited immunity” mode and the “limited application” mode in the application of the Anti-monopoly Law, the author argues that the former is more suited to China. In the content of immunity, the scope of industry immunity should be focused on. For the statutory immunity, the content should be defined by legislation or guidelines; for the case immunity, it should be analyzed under the “rule of reason”. Furthermore, the scope of immunity should alter accordingly as time and condition change, and the direction of narrowing the scope of immunity should be pursued. |
| |
Key words: Anti-monopoly Law; applying scope; immunity; case immunity; statutory immunity |
| |
|
