|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2010)03-0057-07 |
| |
|
合同约束力的判断标准
——以“法内” “法外”之间的允诺为分析对象 |
| |
郭翔峰 |
| |
|
（西南政法大学民商法学院，重庆，400031） |
| |
| 摘 要： 合同经意思表示一致即可成立，对当事人具有约束力。但由于当事人内心意思的模糊性和不确定性，由自由主义衍生出来的主观合意理论，在众多游离于“法内” “法外”之间的允诺的效力判断上存在着极大的局限性。因此，在司法实践中，在坚持大陆法传统主观合意理论的基础之上，应当充分发挥客观合意理论作用，并吸收英美法上对价制度、允诺禁反言制度中的合理成分，以解决上述允诺的效力问题。 |
| |
| 关键词： 合同约束力；主观合意；客观合意；对价；允诺禁反言 |
| |
|
| |
The determination to the binding of contract
——An analysis of promises between the law and virtue |
| |
GUO Xiangfeng |
| |
（Civil Law School of Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 400031, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The contract forms with mutual assent and both parties are bound. But, owing to the indistinct and uncertainty of will, the Subjective Theory in civil law can not distinguish the promises between law and virtue. Therefore, on the basis of subsequent theory, judge should adopt the rational elements of Objective Theory, the Doctrine of Consideration and Promissory Estoppel to solve the above-mentioned problem. |
| |
Key words: the binding of contract; subjective theory; objective theory; consideration; promissory estoppel |
| |
|
