 |
|
|
中南大学学报(社会科学版)
ZHONGNAN DAXUE XUEBAO(SHEHUI KEXUE BAN) |
2007年10月第13卷第5期
|
|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2007)05−0528−06 |
| |
|
我国民事举证期限制度的立法缺陷与完善 |
| |
胡军辉 |
| |
|
（湘潭大学法学院，湖南湘潭，411105） |
| |
| 摘 要： 我国民事举证期限制度的发展经历了随时提出主义阶段、形式的适时提出主义阶段和适时提出主义阶段等三个时期。最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》确立了严格的证据期限制度，但该制度存在以下缺陷：对逾期举证的制裁过于严厉；没有健全的配套措施；确定举证期限的立法不够完善；法院不适当履行释明义务的救济措施缺失。因此，建议在借鉴国外相关立法并结合中国实际情况的基础上对民事举证期限制度作出有针对性的修改。 |
| |
| 关键词： 民事证据；举证期限；举证失权 |
| |
|
| |
On legislative flaw and perfection of the civil limitations of
evidence production system in China |
| |
HU Junhui |
| |
（School of Law, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The development of the civil limitation of evidence production system in China has experienced three phases: the free evidence production stage, the formally time-limited evidence production stage, and the time-limited evidence production stage. Regulations on Civil Action Evidence, promulgated by the Supreme People’s Court, establishes strict limitations of evidence production system which has some flaws, including the too severe sanction for delayed evidence, no completely auxiliary measure, some defects on the rules of determination evidence time-limitation and no relief measures on judge’s unsuitable directions. It is suggested that the system be revised effectively based on the overseas experiences and China’s national situation. |
| |
Key words: civil evidence; time-limit of evidence; proof invalidity |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
