|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2006)05-0554-04 |
| |
|
中国乙肝歧视第一案的合宪性思考 |
| |
何永红 |
| |
|
（宁波大学法学院,浙江宁波, 315211） |
| |
| 摘 要： 乙肝歧视案蕴藏着丰富的宪法问题,学界对此观点不一。该案所涉及的宪法权利系劳动权和参政权,这种自由权利又与平等权发生竞合构成劳动平等权和参政平等权,因而同时受到宪法平等原则的保护。综合衡量基本权的法益重要性、所受限制程度以及政府利益大小,本案宜参照美国的严格审查标准进行宪法判断。本案无法通过严格审查标准的检验,该种限制措施是违宪的。 |
| |
| 关键词： 乙肝歧视;宪法权利;合宪性判断 |
| |
|
| |
On the first case of HBVER discrimination in the view of jurisprudence |
| |
HE Yonghong |
| |
（School of law, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The case of HBVER discrimination contains abundant constitutional problems.Scholars keep different opinions about it. The concerning constitutional rights in the case are the combination of labor right and suffrage,which are both under the protection of the constitutional equality principle. It’s proper to refer to the strictive scrutiny standard performing in American court to judge the constitutional case. The restrict measures imposed on the HBVERs can’t go through the constitutional test under the standard of strict scrutiny. |
| |
Key words: HBVER discrimination; constitutional right; constitutional judgment |
| |
|
|
