|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2006)02-0204-06 |
| |
|
大陆与澳门罪刑法定原则之比较 |
| |
罗翔 |
| |
|
（中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京, 102249） |
| |
| 摘 要： 大陆与澳门两地的罪刑法定原则在历史演进、具体表述以及对待溯及力、习惯法、刑法的解释、明确性问题上存在区别。通过二者的对比,可以丰富我们对罪刑法定原则的理解,更好地促进刑法理论的发展。 |
| |
| 关键词： 罪刑法定;溯及力;习惯法;刑法解释;明确性 |
| |
|
| |
Comparison of the principle“Nullum Crimen Sine Lege ,
Wulla Poena Sine Lege”in Mainland China and Macao |
| |
LUO Xiang |
| |
（Criminal Justice College, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 102249, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Compared the principle“Nullum Crimen Sine Lege , Wulla Poena Sine Lege”in Mainland China and Macao, we find that there are some differences about the principle as follows: history, expression, the problem of ex post facto statute ,custom , interpretation of criminal laws and Void-of-Vagueness Principle. By comparison, it is useful to comprehend the principle“Nullum Crimen Sine Lege , Wulla Poena Sine Lege”and promote the development of theory of criminal law. |
| |
Key words: Nullum Crimen Sine Lege; Wulla Poena Sine Lege; ex post facto statute; custom; interpretation of criminal laws; Void-of-Vagueness Principle |
| |
|
|
