|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2009)04-0698-04 |
| |
|
卢之颐重订《文选纂注》评本述要 |
| |
赵俊玲 |
| |
|
（郑州大学文学院，河南郑州，450001） |
| |
| 摘 要： 天启六年卢之颐重订之《文选纂注》，收录十二家评语于眉端，十二家在当时七子中皆有较大影响力，他们的评语或摘自《文选》专著，或笔记、诗话，或评点著作，真实可信，不为冒名伪托。这些评语以评者强烈的主观介入，对选篇进行了细致的鉴赏评析，尤其在题材相似的篇章间展开的比较批评，对后世的《文选》评点著作产生了较大影响。卢本在选学“课虚”一途上进行了有益尝试，是《文选》评点史上不容忽视的一部著作。 |
| |
| 关键词： 卢之颐；《文选纂注》；评点；评语来源；“课虚” |
| |
|
| |
A brief summary of Wenxuanzuanzhu revised by Lu Zhiyi |
| |
ZHAO Junling |
| |
（College of Literature, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Wenxuanzuanzhu was revised by Lu Zhiyi on the sixth year of Tianqi, which collected comments of twelve scholars who were all very famous at that time. The comments came from the scholars’ works about Wenxuan, or notes, or the annotations of Wenxuan, which weren’t fake. The twelve scholars’ comments analyzed Wenxuan in detail with their own’s strong subjectivity, especially the comparing comments among the analogous essays. The works attempted in the way of “kexu” comparative study and was an important one in the history of the annotations. |
| |
Key words: Lu Zhiyi; Wenxuanzuanzhu; the annotations; the source of the annotations; the way of “kexu” comparative study |
| |
|
