自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
 

中南大学学报(社会科学版)
ZHONGNAN DAXUE XUEBAO(SHEHUI KEXUE BAN)

2007年06月第13卷第3期
   
本文已被:浏览2282次    下载653次   在线阅读20
文章编号:1672-3104(2007)02−0293−05
 
对三种排除非法证据之理由的追问
 
孙远
 
(中国青年政治学院法律系,北京,100089)
 
摘  要: 在美国学界,关于非法证据排除的理由有三个,即维护司法尊严、抑制警察非法取证以及宪法性救济。目前,我国学者也纷纷以这三个理由来论证我国确立非法证据排除规则的必要性。通过对这些理由的逐一分析,认为非法证据排除规则对于我国的作用有限。若要实现刑事诉讼的现代化,我们应当更多地从整个刑事诉讼体制上做文章,而不能将全部期望寄托在非法证据排除这一项规则之上。
 
关键字: 证据排除;司法尊严;宪法救济
 
 
The foundation of exclusionary rule
 
SUN Yuan
 
(Department of Law, China Youth University for Political Sciences, Beijing 100089, China)
 
Abstract:  In the United States, there are three explanations on the foundation of the exclusionary rule: the judicial integrity; deterrent from the illegal police conduct; constitutional remedy. Nowadays, these explanations are being cited to argue for the enactment of exclusionary rule in China. But in author’s opinion, it’s questionable whether these explanations are also persuasive in China. The author believes that the function of the exclusionary rule will be limited in China. More attention should be paid to the whole system of criminal justice judicatory to achieve modernization of criminal procedure.
 
Key words: excluding evidence; judicial integrity; constitutional remedy
 
 
版权所有:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部 
地 址:湖南省长沙市中南大学     邮编: 410083
电 话: 0731-88830141
电子邮箱: znsk@mail.csu.edu.cn 湘ICP备09001153号