|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2023)01-0052-14 |
| |
|
“双碳”目标下提升生态效率与促进家庭收入增长研究 |
| |
解垩，陈昕 |
| |
|
（山东大学经济学院，山东济南，250100） |
| |
| 摘 要： 基于“双碳”与共同富裕并行发展的目标背景，对我国的生态效率进行了评价，并依据宏观和微观匹配数据分析了生态效率对家庭收入的影响效应。研究结果表明：中国生态效率平均水平良好，但存在区域间及区域内部生态效率水平差距较大的问题，随时间推移，生态效率差距问题没有改善迹象；提高生态效率不利于部分家庭总收入增长，且提高生态效率对家庭不同收入来源的影响存在差异，对家庭工资收入、经营收入和财产收入为负向影响，对家庭转移收入和家庭其他收入起到提升作用；另外，生态效率对家庭收入的影响存在显著的区域、城乡和试点政策异质性，提高生态效率将降低东部地区家庭、农村家庭和低碳试点省份家庭的收入；进一步研究发现，提升生态效率对收入水平较低群体的不利影响相对较大，且影响程度随时间推移并没有减轻的迹象。虽然提高生态效率可能会不利于部分家庭的收入增长，但该“阵痛”可以通过学历教育和非学历培训减弱，由此促进“双碳”与共同富裕两个目标的共同实现。 |
| |
| 关键词： “双碳”；共同富裕；生态效率；超效率SBM模型；家庭收入 |
| |
|
| |
Study on improving ecological efficiency and promoting household income growth under the "dual carbon" targets |
| |
XIE E, CHEN Xin |
| |
（School of Economics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Under the target background of the parallel development of, on one hand, the "dual carbon" of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, and on the other hand common prosperity, the present study evaluates the ecological efficiency, and analyzes the influence effect of ecological efficiency on household income based on macro and micro matching data. Research results show that the average level of ecological efficiency in China is good, but there is a huge gap between and within regions, about which there is no sign of improvement over time. Results also show that improving ecological efficiency is not conducive to the growth of some households’ total income, and ecological efficiency has different impacts on different income sources with a negative impact on household wage income, operation income and property income, but with a positive effect on transferring income and other household income. In addition, researches still find that the impact of ecological efficiency on household income is significantly heterogeneous in regional, urban-rural and low-carbon pilot policies, while improving ecological efficiency will reduce the income of households in eastern regions, rural areas and low-carbon pilot provinces. Further studies find that the adverse effect of ecological efficiency on the lower income group is relatively greater, and the effect does not show signs of weakening over time. Although improving ecological efficiency may hurt some households’ income, the "pain" can be mitigated through educational and non-educational training so as to contribute to realization of the two goals of "dual carbon" and common prosperity. |
| |
Key words: "dual" carbon; common prosperity; ecological efficiency; super-efficient SBM model; household income |
| |
|
|
