|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2023)01-0021-11 |
| |
|
党内法规属性的再认识 |
| |
刘长秋 |
| |
|
（上海政法学院纪检监察学院，上海，201701） |
| |
| 摘 要： 软法概念输入之初，学者们关于党内法规的软法属性已成定论。新近对这一结论的质疑，或是对软法理解的偏误，或是无视党内法规与国家法效力来源机制的差异，或因误解党内法规自身的严厉性。事实上，硬法范围的特定性，决定了我们无法将党内法规纳入硬法范畴；党内法规调整的特点，也完全契合软法调整的特点。尽管未来有将党内法规作为第三种形态法的理论可能，但目前软法理论依然具有对党内法规性质的解释力。将党内法规视为软法，也更利于科学地理解和解释与党内法规同类性质的社会治理规则。 |
| |
| 关键词： 党内法规；软法；硬法；国家法 |
| |
|
| |
Re-thinking of the attribute of intra-Party laws and regulations |
| |
LIU Changqiu |
| |
（School of Discipline Inspection and Supervision, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201701, China） |
| |
| Abstract: At the beginning of the introduction of the concept of soft law, scholars made a conclusion about the soft law attribute of intra-Party laws and regulations. The recent query into this conclusion is either a misunderstanding of the soft law, or a disregard of the difference between the effectiveness source mechanism of the intra-Party laws and national laws, or a misunderstanding of the severity of the intra-Party laws. In fact, the specificity of the scope of hard law determines that we cannot bring intra-Party laws and regulations into the scope of hard law. The characteristics of the adjustment of intra-Party laws and regulations also fully conform to the characteristics of the adjustment of soft law. Although it is theoretically possible to regard intra-Party laws and regulations as the third form of law in the future, the current soft law theory still has the explanatory power to the nature of intra-Party laws and regulations. To regard intra-Party laws and regulations as soft law is more conducive to scientific understanding and interpretation of social governance rules of the same nature as intra-Party laws and regulations. |
| |
Key words: intra-Party laws and regulations; soft law; hard law; national law |
| |
|
