|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2007)03−0280−06 |
| |
|
论我国违宪审查模式的选择 |
| |
侯宇 |
| |
|
（浙江大学法学院，浙江杭州，310028） |
| |
| 摘 要： 违宪审查制度在人权保障中发挥着无可替代的作用。违宪审查有着其自身的理论基础和逻辑前提，结合各国传统，违宪审查模式衍生出司法机关审查、宪法法院审查、宪法委员会审查等三种模式。由于对人性的漠视和对权力的崇拜以及由此而来的忽略宪法控权功能的立宪观念，使我国违宪审查机制迟迟没有启动。只有选择了适合国情的违宪审查制度并使之真正运转起来，中国的人权保障才会有一个稳固可靠的制度基础。 |
| |
| 关键词： 违宪审查制度；人权保障；普通法院审查模式；宪法法院审查模式；专门机关审查模式 |
| |
|
| |
Road to constitutional review |
| |
HOU Yu |
| |
（College of Law, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Constitutional review functions as an institution to protect human rights, in which its own theory and cultural bases is found. There are three models of constitutional review, and each of which has its legitimate. Chinese having looked down upon humanity and genuflecting crazily toward power, there is no institution to control powers. Human rights protection in China could be realized, if there runs suitable constitutional review smoothly.
|
| |
Key words: constitutional review; human rights protection; review by ordinary court; review by constitutional court; review by special organ |
| |
|
