|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2022)06-0132-08 |
| |
|
国际战略的唯物史观阐释与“世界之问”的中国答案 |
| |
兰洋 |
| |
|
（中国人民大学马克思主义学院，北京，100872） |
| |
| 摘 要： 马克思从核心主轴、基本要素、辩证关系和价值指向等方面实现了对西方传统话语的变革，开创了国际战略研究的唯物史观范式。站在唯物史观的高度，可以发现中西国际战略的本质差别：西方国际战略的核心主轴是资本逻辑，主要目的是维持霸权，思维方式是零和博弈，价值取向是唯我独尊。而中国的国际战略则是坚持人民至上的发展理念，坚持领导型而非霸权型的权力逻辑，坚持普惠性的辩证思维，坚持以文明新秩序为核心的价值取向。总览今日世界，西方国家的国际战略正日益丧失主宰世界历史的能力，而中华民族伟大复兴则构成了人类文明历史性变革的“关键变量”。 |
| |
| 关键词： 唯物史观；国际战略；中国方案 |
| |
|
| |
Interpretation of historical materialism of international strategy and China's answer to the question of the world |
| |
LAN Yang |
| |
（School of Marxism, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Marx revolutionized the western traditional discourse from the aspects of core axis, basic elements, dialectical relationship and value orientation, and created the materialistic historical paradigm of international strategic studies. Standing on the pinnacle of historical materialism, we can find the essential difference between Chinese and Western international strategies: the core axis of Western international strategies is capital logic, the main purpose is to maintain hegemony, the way of thinking is zero sum game, and the value orientation is egoism. China's international strategy, on the other hand, adheres to the development concept of people first, the power logic of leadership rather than hegemony, the dialectical thinking of inclusiveness, and the value orientation of taking the new civilized order as the core. In short, the international strategies of western countries are increasingly losing the ability to dominate world history, while the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation constitutes the "key variable" of the historic change of human civilization. |
| |
Key words: historical materialism；international strategy；China's plan |
| |
|
|
