|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2020)01-0040-06 |
| |
|
心灵与世界的连续性——基于塞拉斯和米丽肯哲学的自然主义辩护 |
| |
周靖 |
| |
|
（上海社会科学院哲学研究所，上海，200235） |
| |
| 摘 要： 塞拉斯指出康德的直观概念具有模糊性，即康德的直观概念混淆了非概念表征和概念表征，非概念表征是无一丝概念渗透的感觉材料，概念表征则兼具关涉外间世界中内容和概念的双维面向。通过类比论证，塞拉斯试图维系作为知识基础的概念表征的双维面向之间的关联，但他似乎隐在承诺了物理对象的结构与概念表达的结构之间有着严格的同构性，从而设定了一个认知理想，即使用概念的科学语汇将最终实现对认知对象的完全表达。引入米丽肯在论述殊念和殊踪时体现的自然主义思想，可消除类比论证隐在承诺的二元论思维，以及对双维面向严格同构性的承诺。在进一步凸显双维面向之间的连续性时，可以确证知识之于世界的关涉性，甚至容纳实在论，但可以解除承诺认知理想时所承受的理论重负。 |
| |
| 关键词： 直观；概念表征；自然主义；殊念 |
| |
|
| |
The continuity of mind and world：Naturalist defensebased on philosophy extracted from Sellars and Millikan |
| |
ZHOU Jing |
| |
（Institute of Philosophy, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai 200235, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Sellars points out that Kant's concept of direct sensing is ambiguous, which indicates that Kant mixes non-conceptual representation up with conceptual representation. Non-conceptual representation is purely of sense data, while the conceptual representation is both of/about two dimensions relating both contents and concepts of the external physical world. Sellars attempts, through Analogy Argument, to maintain the dual dimensional connection of the conceptual representation as the basis of knowledge, but he seems to be promising an implicit but strong commitment to the strict isomorphism between the structure of physical objects and its corresponding conceptual construction. He hence acqures a cognitive ideal in mind that we will manage to achieve a complete expression of the object which can be known by the perfection of scientific vocabulary. By introducing Millikan's naturalist thoughts of her discussions about the notions of unicept and unitracker, the dualistic thoughtimplied in the Analogy Argument and the invalid commitment to the strict isomorphism of the world-mind relation can be eliminated. By further highlighting the continuity between the world-mind relation of the conceptual representation, not only the externality of the world is affirmed, but a sort of realism is promised. Meanwhile, we will relieve ourselves from the heavy theoretical burden to actualize the cognitive ideal. |
| |
Key words: intuition; conceptual representation; naturalism; unicept |
| |
|
