自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
 

中南大学学报(社会科学版)
ZHONGNAN DAXUE XUEBAO(SHEHUI KEXUE BAN)

2019年03月第25卷第2期
   
本文已被:浏览1467次    下载833次   
文章编号:1672-3104(2019)02-0050-09
 
无争议事实记载机制的实践乱象与规范对策
 
李喜莲,肖文
 
(湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭,411105)
 
摘  要: 剖析相关案例及改革文本发现,无争议事实记载机制在试点运行中乱象丛生,集中表现为:无争议事实记载机制的程序操作有欠规范,无争议事实的法律性质模糊。产生前述乱象的要因是:无争议事实记载机制的理论基础薄弱,已经运行的无争议事实记载机制与相关制度难以调适,无争议事实记载机制缺乏相应的程序保障。据此,应以证据契约理论为理论基础,在规范层面明确无争议事实以拟制自认之性质,从客体范围、记录载体、出具主体及异议询问等环节规范具体运作程序,从而破除无争议事实记载机制的试行乱象。
 
关键词: 无争议事实;无争议事实记载机制;证据契约
 
 
The practical predicament and the countermeasure of the undisputed fact record mechanism
 
LI Xilian, XIAO Wen
 
(School of Law, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China)
 
Abstract: By analyzing relevant cases and reform texts as guidance, we realize that the practice of the undisputed fact record mechanism is disordered in the pilot phase, whose confusion is mainly manifested in the unnormative operational procedure and vague legal nature of the undisputed fact. The main reasons for such chaos include its unsubstantial theoretical basis, the out-of-order convergence between its operation and other mechanisms, and the lack of procedural safeguards. In view of this, we should take the evidence contract as theoretical basis, clarify at the level of regulation the nature of the undisputed fact record as text’s implied admission, and regulate specific operational procedure from the scope of the object, carrier, provider, time of application so as to eliminate the chaotic phenomenon.
 
Key words: undisputed fact; the undisputed fact record mechanism; evidence contract
 
 
版权所有:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部 
地 址:湖南省长沙市岳麓区麓山南路932号     邮编: 410083
电 话: 0731-88830141
电子邮箱: znsk@csu.edu.cn 湘ICP备09001153号-4