|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2017)05-0045-08 |
| |
|
论行政许可裁量基准 |
| |
郭跃 |
| |
|
（安徽中医药大学人文学院，安徽合肥，230012） |
| |
| 摘 要： 许可裁量权的滥用及许可实施的机械主义均为行政许可的恣意，并不符合许可正义实施的要求。许可裁量权的存在及对其功能主义的检视突破了裁量基准对行政处罚的原初和典型适用，实质上多数情形下许可标准是法律标准与裁量基准的混合。行政许可裁量基准有区别于其他行政行为裁量基准的法律个性，包括全面公开性要求、类别化的技术构造和直接的对外效力，并且这种特性构成了其作为司法审查依据的基础。 |
| |
| 关键词： 行政许可；行政许可标准；裁量基准；司法审查 |
| |
|
| |
On administrative permission standard |
| |
GUO Yue |
| |
（School of Humanity, Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230012, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Both the abuse of permission discretionary power and mechanism of permission implementation can be regarded as arbitrary administrative license, which does not comply with the licensing requirements of the implementation of justice. The existence of the right of discretion and the examination of its function have broken through the original and typical application of the discretion benchmark to the administrative penalty. In essence, the licensing standard is the mixture of the legal standard and the discretion benchmark. The administrative licensing discretion of legal personality is different from other administrative discretion, including constructing comprehensive public requirement, classification and direct external validity, and the characteristics of its foundation constitute the basis for its judicial review. |
| |
Key words: administrative permission; administrative permission standard; discretion standard; judicial review |
| |
|
