|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2017)01-0161-07 |
| |
|
论“语-图非合作关系”及其意义生成 |
| |
刘依 |
| |
|
（南京大学文学院，江苏南京，210023） |
| |
| 摘 要： 在关于“语-图”的已有研究中，“语-图”互仿尚不能很好地解释“语-图”合体中存在的“驱逐”“解构”等“语-图”不一致现象。从言语交际角度出发，参照语用学相关研究，我们将其命名为“语-图非合作关系”，通过探讨这一现象在现实语境中的实际特征、现实根据和发生条件，以及“语-图”不一致所具有的构成关系和表意原则，发现其意义生成因循关联原则，受话者通过“语-图”特定关联性推理会话含义的认知机制。作为发话者的语言符号或图像符号故意违反合作准则来传递隐含含义，发话者故意不遵守合作准则，但目的不是中断交流，而是让受话者根据关联原则，超越“语-图”符号的表面意义去设法寻找两者的关联性，推理发话者所说语-图符号的会话含义，实现最佳语境效果。 |
| |
| 关键词： “语-图非合作关系”；格赖斯合作原则；会话含义；语境效果；关联理论 |
| |
|
| |
On “language-image non-cooperation” and its significance generation |
| |
LIU Yi |
| |
（School of Liberal Arts, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China） |
| |
| Abstract: In previous studies on linguistic graphs, linguistic graphic inconsistency cannot be fully explained in linguistic-metaphorical equivalence. From the point of view of verbal communication, the occurre, nce of verbal-image is regarded as a symbolic communication process between language and image, and can be named as “language-image non-cooperation” in reference to pragmatics. On this basis, the meaning of “language-image non-cooperation” is generated by the cognitive mechanism of conversational implicature through the relevance-based reasoning. As the speaker of the language symbols or image symbols intentionally violates the cooperation criteria to convey the implied meaning, the speaker deliberately does not comply with the cooperation guidelines, but the purpose is not to interrupt the exchange, but to allow the recipient according to the principle of association so as to transcend language, to find the relevance of the two, to reason the speaker's language-image meaning of the conversation and to achieve the best contextual effect. |
| |
|
| |
|
