|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2015)04-0183-09 |
| |
|
《创业史》与“十七年”小说的欲望抒写问题 |
| |
王再兴 |
| |
|
（怀化学院中文系，湖南怀化，418008） |
| |
| 摘 要： 如何处理“欲望”，一直是当年集体主义文学令人纠结的问题。但欲望始终隐蔽地存在，却是客观的事实。《创业史》仍然反向地表现出了欲望的诸多踪迹。另一方面，由于1950年代末特殊的历史语境，个人欲望与尊严均被压抑，这意味着主体之间间性关系的萎顿。由此导致的结果，只能是个人(“新人”)的不完全的主体性。这个庞大的讲述农村集体主义改造“历史”的故事体系，看起来还是有着太多的脆弱之处。究其根源，或许在于讲述之始就被作者刻意隐藏的“欲望”，以及被鄙弃的作为欲望转换中介的“计算”。它们成为柳青和《创业史》遗留至今的未尽的话题。 |
| |
| 关键词： 农民小说；欲望；“历史”化；集体主义文学 |
| |
|
| |
The History of Entrepreneurship and desire expressionof the novels in“17 years” |
| |
WANG Zaixing |
| |
（Department of Chinese, Huaihua College, Huaihua 418008, China） |
| |
| Abstract: How to handle “desires” was always a serious problem for the collectivist literature of those years. But the fact was that desires were always there though concealed by the reality. The History of Entrepreneurship indicated many traces of desires reversely. On the other hand, oppression of personal desires and dignity meant that the intersubjectivity withered because of special historical context in the late 1950s. Those resulted in incompletion of the subjectivity of individuals (“New People”). This grand story system still looked having too many weak points. The deep reasons probably lay in “desires” concealed by the author intentionally from beginning, and “calculation” as the desire conversion agent disdained. Since then, desires and calculation have become never-ending topics left behind by Liu Qing and The History of Entrepreneurship. |
| |
Key words: farmer novels; desires; “historicize”; collectivist literature |
| |
|
