|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2015)03-0086-07 |
| |
|
我国第三人撤销之诉若干问题的新思考 |
| |
胡军辉，张瑞鑫 |
| |
|
（湘潭大学法学院，湖南湘潭，411105） |
| |
| 摘 要： 第三人撤销之诉程序有四种不同的类型，我国立法规定的是独立型第三人撤销之诉程序。在性质上，第三人撤销之诉既属于事前救济程序又属于事后救济程序。在审级利益的保护上，当事人之间存在不可避免的不对等，需要对相关救济程序进行特殊的设置以达到适度平衡的目的。第三人撤销之诉的制度目的和功能定位具有复合性，但应当突出其纠错功能、事后救济功能和实体救济功能。我国现行法对第三人撤销之诉的程序设置并不够完善，仍需要对其进行进一步的修改。 |
| |
| 关键词： 第三人撤销之诉；程序类型与性质；审级利益；功能定位；程序完善 |
| |
|
| |
New thinking on suit for the third party to revoke judgment in China |
| |
HU Junhui, ZHANG Ruixin |
| |
（School of Law, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China） |
| |
| Abstract: There are four different types of suit for the third party to revoke judgment. Under the Chinese Legislation, such suit is independent suit of the third party. In essence, it is the pre-action of aiding procedure and post-action of legal remedy procedure. As to the protection of interests at the case-hearing level, there inevitably exist discrepancies between plaintiff and defendant. Hence, we need to set up special relevant relief procedures in order to achieve a proper balance. The suit for the third party to revoke judgment is complex in its purposes and functions, but should be highlighted in its functions including correcting errors, afterwards relief and entity relief. In our current legislation, such suit still has inadequacies in procedures, and further modifications need to be made. |
| |
Key words: suit for the third party to revoke judgment; procedure types and nature; case-hearing level interests; functional localization; improvement of procedure |
| |
|
|
