|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2015)02-0060-07 |
| |
|
论假设性法律推理 |
| |
齐建英 |
| |
|
（郑州大学马克思主义学院，河南郑州，450001） |
| |
| 摘 要： 假设性推理是相对于演绎推理和归纳推理提出的“第三类推理”，其基本特征主要体现在前提的不完备性、结论的非单调性和过程的对话性上。法律推理是一种在特定语境中进行的言语交际活动。正是语境如影随形地影响着法律推理的整个言语进程，法律推理才呈现出假设性的特征，作为假设性推理而存在。假设性法律推理的提出并不是对法律推理其他逻辑形式的否定，而是对法律推理逻辑属性的进一步认识和深化。在追求确定性和可预测性的基础上，肯认法律推理的假设性，法律推理就有了更加全面而统一的逻辑基础。 |
| |
| 关键词： 假设性推理；法律推理；语境；演绎推理；归纳推理 |
| |
|
| |
On the hypothetical legal reasoning |
| |
QI Jianying |
| |
（School of Maxism, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Hypothetical reasoning is “the third type of reasoning” which is relative to deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning and whose basic characteristics are mainly embodied in the imperfect premise, thenon-monotonic conclusion and the dialogic process. Legal reasoning is a kind of verbal communication activity in a specific context. It is the context that affects the entire speech process in legal reasoning which presents hypothetical traits, existing as hypothetical reasoning. Hypothetical legal reasoning is not a denial to other legal reasoning logic forms, but a further understanding of legal reasoning logic properties. Based on pursuing certainty and predictability, hypothetical legal reasoning is affirmed, which provides a more comprehensive and unified logic basis. |
| |
Key words: hypothetical legal reasoning; legal reasoning; context; deductive reasoning; inductive reasoning |
| |
|
