|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2014)06-0206-09 |
| |
|
公共能量场的理论阙失及其补构 |
| |
韩艺 |
| |
|
（南昌大学公共管理学院，江西南昌，330031） |
| |
| 摘 要： 公共能量场自提出以来，被视为具有代表公共行政研究范式转型的极高学术价值。但严格来说，由于忽视了情境、结构与过程，关于公共能量场存在着概念指涉不明朗、形成与结构不明确、过程不清晰等阙失。为此，需要基于情境维、结构维、过程维三个维度，通过内涵再界定、剖析公共能量场的内在构成并构建起SSP分析框架，对公共能量场加以补构。实际上，补构公共能量场，特别是基于SSP分析框架，能够确定公共能量场的三个维度“基面”、分析公共能量场所包括的议题、能量、场域、场核、场结、场体、场用、场促等八大“要素” ，并能透析“基面”和“要素”之下的各个“因子”之间的关联，从而达到丰富公共能量场治理蕴涵、赋之内容构成并使其发展成为一种有效的分析工具乃至研究范式的目的。 |
| |
| 关键词： 后现代；公共能量场；公共行政；政策话语；意向；情境；SSP分析框架 |
| |
|
| |
Lack and its supplementary construction of the public energy field |
| |
HAN Yi |
| |
（School of Public Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Public energy field was considered as having high academic value in representing the transformation of public administration paradigm as it was put forward. But strictly speaking, Public Energy Field research has problems in obscure configuration, ambiguous composition and structure, and unclear process. It’s necessary to reconstruct Public Energy Field by redefining conception, analyzing inner elements and building a SSP framework. In fact, by especially by redefining SSP framework, we can define the three dimensions and eight elements of Public Energy and analyze the factors hidden behind the dimensions and elements. Furthermore, we can not only enrich Public Energy Field implication and endow its context but also advance it to be an effective analytical tool or a research paradigm. |
| |
Key words: postmodern era; public energy field; public administration; policy discourses; intention; configuration; SSP analytical framework |
| |
|
