|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2013)06-0027-08 |
| |
|
也论康德的“纯粹自然科学”之为“纯粹哲学”
——对罗中枢教授观点的补释 |
| |
彭志君，舒远招 |
| |
|
（湖南师范大学公共管理学院，湖南长沙，410081） |
| |
| 摘 要： 罗中枢教授关于康德的“纯粹自然科学”并非指通常意义上的自然科学，而是指纯粹哲学或一般自然的形而上学的观点非常独到，但也使人产生了两个疑问：首先，如果“纯粹自然科学”就是一般自然的形而上学，那么，康德为什么在追问“纯粹自然科学是如何可能的？”时，还要把“形而上学作为一种自然倾向是如何可能的？”和“形而上学作为科学是如何可能的？”这两个问题单独提出来？其次，如果康德的“纯粹自然科学”就是一般自然的形而上学，它与一般自然科学或牛顿物理学有何关系？本文试图对罗教授的观点作一补释，从“纯粹理性的建筑术”的角度来理解康德的“纯粹自然科学”，并力图解答上述两个疑问。 |
| |
| 关键词： 纯粹理性；建筑术；康德；纯粹自然科学；形而上学；纯粹哲学 |
| |
|
| |
Look on Kant’s “pure natural science” from “the architectonic of pure reason”—— Start to discuss from Professor of LUO Zhongshu’s view |
| |
PENG Zhijun, SHU Yuanzhao |
| |
（School of Public Administration, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China） |
| |
| Abstract: In one of Professor of LUO Zhongshu’s papers, he pointed out that Kant’s “pure natural science” is not the general science, but the pure philosophy or metaphysics of general nature. It is obvious that Professor LUO’ view is original and instructive. But, Professor LUO’s view has has given rise to two problems. First, if Kant’s “pure natural science” is general natural metaphysics, why Kant asked “How pure natural science is possible?”, and why he asked “How is it possible to take the metaphysics as a natural tendency?” and “How is it possible to take the general metaphysics as a science?”. Second, if Kant’s “pure natural science” is general natural metaphysics, what’s the relations between “pure natural science” and general natural science or Newton’s physics. The authors try to understand Kant’s “pure natural science” from “The Archetectnic of Pure Reason”, and tried to answer the two problems above, which attempts to develop Professor LUO’s view about Kant’s “pure natural science”. |
| |
Key words: pure reason; archetictnic; Kant; pure natural science; metaphysics, pure philosophy |
| |
|
