|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2013)01-0108-06 |
| |
|
困境与出路：开发区管委会法律性质之辩 |
| |
余宗良 |
| |
|
（武汉大学法学院，湖北武汉，430072） |
| |
| 摘 要： 中国开发区是行政权不断调适、收缩、社会化的试验田。但开发区的制度供给滞后，管委会的行政主体资格缺失衍生出一系列的问题。成因涉及渐进式改革和经济功能主导的路径依赖、职责同构与条块分割的府级关系、单中心的传统行政法学分析范式。基于行政法学理论的准备、开发区治理探索、体制创新的国家战略定位、满足区域治理需求、国际游戏规则的遵从，管委会身份应为社会主体，将之界定为公务法人方为正解。 |
| |
| 关键词： 开发区管委会；法律性质；行政主体；公务法人 |
| |
|
| |
Dilemma and solutions: Debate on the legal nature of Development Zone Management Committee |
| |
YU Zongliang |
| |
（Law School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Development zones in China are the test fields continuously underging adjustment, contraction，socialization. Unfortunately, various problems occur due to lagging of institution supply and deficiency of the qualification of administrative subject. The reasons involve the dependence on the way dominated by gradual reforms and economic functions, the intergovernmental relations of isomorphic responsibility and compartmentalization, homocentric traditional legal analytic paradigm. Taking into account preparation of the administrative law theory, exploration of the development zone governance, national strategic orientation of institutional innovation, the need for regional governance, compliance of the rules of international game, the identity of social entity of Management Committee should be defined as Public Agency. |
| |
Key words: development zone management committee; legal nature; administrative subject; public agency |
| |
|
|
