自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
 

中南大学学报(社会科学版)
ZHONGNAN DAXUE XUEBAO(SHEHUI KEXUE BAN)

2008年06月第14卷第3期
   
本文已被:浏览4108次    下载1252次   
文章编号:1672-3104(2008)03−0339−06
 
民事诉讼证据收集与异议制度的比较研究
 
戴锐
 
(北京大学法学院,北京,100871)
 
摘  要: 证据收集是证据得以提出的前提,在当事人主义与职权主义两种模式下,当事人与法院在证据收集过程中的职能分工也有不同。证据收集往往会涉及到诉讼外的第三人,证据异议制度的建立有利于诉讼外第三人利益的合理保障,也有利于证据规则的适用。我国有关证据收集制度的规定还非常不完备,异议制度也没有建立起来,亟待加强与完善。
 
关键词: 证据收集;异议;证据裁定;程序保障
 
 
A comparative study on the collection and motion of evidence in civil proceeding
 
DAI Rui
 
(College of Law, Beijing University, Beijing 100871, China)
 
Abstract: Collection of evidence is the precondition of the evidence introducing. Litigant and judge have different functions in the proceeding of evidence collection,according to the adversary system and inquisitorial system. In case of the reasonable interests of the non-party, the founding of a system of evidence motion is necessary. Since the rule about the collection of evidence and motion of evidence is not consummate in China, promotion work has to be done about it.
 
Key words: collection of evidence; motion of evidence; judge of evidence; proceedings guarantee
 
 
版权所有:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部 
地 址:湖南省长沙市岳麓区麓山南路932号     邮编: 410083
电 话: 0731-88830141
电子邮箱: znsk@csu.edu.cn 湘ICP备09001153号-4