|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2012)06-0067-07 |
| |
|
法律解释的“科学主义”解构 |
| |
郑旭文 |
| |
|
（福州大学法学院，福建福州，350108） |
| |
| 摘 要： 法学科学主义倡导法律解释的客观性和确定性，排除主观性因素的介入，试图通过数理逻辑的方式获得法律问题的解答。哲学诠释学的本体论转向颠覆了法学科学主义的客观性神话，而以不确定性概念为主张的后现代法学则加速了法律解释主观化的趋势。法律解释的主体性解放不仅是现代法治的必然结果，同时也是现实社会关系变迁的本质要求。法律解释既是追求法律中所蕴涵的客观理性的过程，也是解释者主体性因素参与体现主体精神需求和德行水准的过程。 |
| |
| 关键词： 科学主义；客观性命题；主体性；法律解释学 |
| |
|
| |
Deconstruction of scientific principle of Legal Hermeneutics |
| |
ZHENG Xuwen |
| |
（School of Law, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Legal scientism advocates for objectivity and certainty of legal interpretation and opposes involvement of subjective factors, trying to get answers to legal questions by the way of mathematical logic which turns to the theory of hermeneutics to ontology subverts the myth of the “objectivity” of the legal scientism. Postmodern jurisprudence which advocates the concept of uncertainty has accelerated the trend of subjectivilization of legal interpretation. The liberation of subjectivity in legal interpretation is not only the inevitable result of modern rule of law, but also the essential requirement of change of social relations. Legal interpretation is the process of pursuit of objective rationality and it is of involvement in interpreter’s subjective factor that reflects his spiritual needs and moral standards. |
| |
Key words: scientism; objectivity proposition; subjectivity; legal hermeneutics |
| |
|
