|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2012)05-0094-06 |
| |
|
论债权让与通知中的适格主体
--兼评我国《合同法》第80条第1款 |
| |
王婷婷，范卫国 |
| |
|
（西南政法大学经济法学院，重庆，401120；重庆市南岸区人民检察院，重庆，400060） |
| |
| 摘 要： 自罗马法时期，关于债权让与通知的适格主体应为让与人还是受让人的问题已有争论，但迄今为止各国立法对该问题的态度依旧存有分歧。我国合同法虽然规定了由让与人履行通知债务人的义务，但对受让人能否在一定条件下成为债权让与通知的主体则未予涉及。纵观各国立法，将受让人作为债权让与通知的适格主体不仅必要而且可行。因此，我国《合同法》第80条应进行扩张解释，将受让人纳入到让与通知的主体范畴，以应对实践中出现的难题。 |
| |
| 关键词： 债权让与；让与通知；受让人；让与人；适格主体；《合同法》 |
| |
|
| |
On the proper subject of the notice of assignment: on the Paragraph 1 of Article 80 of China’s Contract Law |
| |
WANG Tingting, FAN Weiguo |
| |
（Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China;
People’s Procuratorate of Chongqing Nan’an Distract, Chongqing 400060, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Since the Roman law period，there exists controversy as to whether the proper subject of the notice of assignment should be the assignor or the assignee, and so far the standpoints of the national legislation are still different. On this question, the Chinese Contract Law provides that it is the obligation of the assignor to notify the debtor, however, whether the assignee can be the appropriate subject of notifying under certain conditions is not addressed. After inspection of the legislation overseas, we found that it is necessary and feasible for the assignee to be the proper subject of the notice of assignment. Therefore, the article 80 of the Contract Law should be extensive interpreted to bring the assignee into the subject category in order to face the emerging challenges in practice. |
| |
Key words: assignment of creditor’s rights; notice of assignment; the assignee; assignor; proper subject; Contract Law |
| |
|
