|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2008)02−0272−05 |
| |
|
中国高等教育大众化理论的反思 |
| |
张继明 |
| |
|
（泰山学院教育系，山东泰安，271021） |
| |
| 摘 要： 特罗高等教育三阶段论的本质内涵不仅仅是一个量的划分，而是量的扩张与质的变化相结合。它适应了当时西方社会高等教育扩大规模的要求，为当时欧美国家关于高等教育发展方向的论争提供了一个关于规模扩张的理论导向，对高等教育走向多样化有深远影响。但特罗理论本身缺乏科学论证，并被实践证明存在缺陷。中美两国的高等教育发展及其外部环境相差甚远，理论的构建不具备共同的现实基础，特罗理论不能简单地为我所用。15%的大众化指标不适合我国高等教育发展的实际，多样化的高等教育质量观具有一定的模糊性，掩盖了质量要求的严格性。中国高等教育理论要实现创新，必须走本土化之路。 |
| |
| 关键词： 高等教育；大众化理论；特罗；高等教育三阶段论 |
| |
|
| |
A rethink about mass higher education theory of China |
| |
ZHANG Jiming |
| |
（Education Department, Taishan College, Tiaan 271021, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The essential connotation of Trow’s theory about three stages of development in higher education is not only a quantitative partition, but a combination of quantitative expansion with qualitative change. The theory adapted to the demand of Hesperian scale expansion of higher education, and supplied an instruction about scale expansion in the argument of higher education developing direction for Occident, effecting the higher education’s diversification. But Trow’s theory is short of scientific reasoning, and is proved faulty in action. The differences between China and America in higher education per se and its exterior conditions, so there is no realistic foundation, and this theory can’t be used by us straightway. The 15% target doesn’t fit for our realistic development of higher education, and the multiple higher education quality viewpoint is misty, which conceals the strict demand to quality. The higher education theory of China must choose the localization way to making innovations. |
| |
Key words: higher education; mass higher education theory; Martin Trow; theory about three stages of development in higher education |
| |
|
