|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2012)04-0032-06 |
| |
|
《自然辩证法》的真旨及其意义 |
| |
赵江飞 |
| |
|
（吉林大学哲学基础理论研究中心暨哲学社会学院，吉林长春，130012） |
| |
| 摘 要： 对于《自然辩证法》一书在学术界有截然不同的评价，这些评价都建立在认为《自然辩证法》是一本关于“辩证法”的教科书的基础之上，书的目的在于以自然科学研究成果来论述辩证法的三大规律，进而使人通过掌握辩证法三大规律来掌握辩证法。然而，这样理解并未触及《自然辩证法》的真实涵义。恩格斯的《自然辩证法》是按照从抽象上升到具体的辩证法方式来叙述的，意图通过以辩证法分析自然科学成果这一过程来说明真正的辩证法为何以及人们掌握辩证法的必要性。这样，恩格斯辩证法并非因为实体化而失去了批判性和革命性，而是在研究具体问题的过程中随着问题的不断丰富和深入，辩证法本身也在不断丰富和发展。 |
| |
| 关键词： 《自然辩证法》；教科书哲学；恩格斯；辩证法 |
| |
|
| |
The intrinsic meaning and significance of Dialectics of Nature |
| |
ZHAO Jiangfei |
| |
（Research Center of Basic Philosophical Theories, School of Philosophy and Society,
Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China） |
| |
| Abstract: There are large numbers of evaluations toward Dialectics of Nature in the Academic field. All of these evaluations consistently argue that Dialectics of Nature is a textbook about dialectics. The purpose of the book is to discuss the three rules of dialectics through the achievement in natural science, which makes person understand the dialectics through knowing three rules of dialectics. However, this kind of understanding is not consistent with the real intrinsic meaning of Engles’ Dialectics of Nature. In order to explain what the real dialectics is and the importance for people to understand dialectics correctly through analyzing the achievements of natural science. Dialectics of Nature narrates based on the narrating way of dialectics which states from the abstract to the specific. Thus, Engles’ dialectics as well as dialectics itself develops and enriches deeply and significantly through evaluating and researching specific issues instead of the common notion that Engles’ dialectic is substantiated which loses criticality and revolutionary. |
| |
Key words: Dialectics of Nature; textbook of philosophy; Engels; dialectics |
| |
|
