自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
自然科学版 英文版
 

中南大学学报(社会科学版)
ZHONGNAN DAXUE XUEBAO(SHEHUI KEXUE BAN)

2012年02月第18卷第1期
   
本文已被:浏览3037次    下载1063次   
文章编号:1672-3104(2012)01-0101-07
 
全球500强企业排行榜对比分析及启示
 
王旭,霍彤
 
(云南财经大学研究生部,云南昆明,650221;云南财经大学商学院,云南昆明,650221)
 
摘  要: 《金融时报》《财富》分别发布了全球500强企业排行榜,所评全球500强企业、行业、国家分布大相径庭。在这种情况下需确定哪个榜单更贴近企业综合实力排行,以确定榜单对企业的实际借鉴意义。通过因子分析赋权法分别对两榜单所统计市值、净收益、总资产、营业收入、人均利润5个变量进行权重分析,结果显示5个变量按权重从大到小排序分别为:人均利润28.09%、总资产26.41%、净收益16.20%、市值15.86%、营业收入13.44%。在权重分析的基础上对我国上榜企业竞争力进行评价,并提出提升综合竞争力的相关建议。
 
关键词: 全球500强;企业排行榜:企业竞争力;权重;综合评分
 
 
The comparative analysis of top 500 companies of the
world and the revelation
 
WANG Xu, HUO Tong
 
(Business School, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics;
 Granduate Department, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics Kunming 650221, China)
 
Abstract: It is completely different distribution of enterprise, industry, national between Fortune 500 and the FT Global 500. To make sure the actual significance of the list, which should find which list is more close to the enterprise comprehensive strength ranked. Weights analysing market value, net income, the total assets, business income, per income by the weighting factor analysis, the result is the weight of the five variables can be ordered as per income 28.09%, the total assets 26.41%, net income 16.20%, market value15.86%, business income 13.44%. This paper evaluates our country 500 enterprise’s competitiveness on the basis of Weights analysing and propounds the way to enforce competitiveness.
 
Key words: top 500 companies of the world; List of top enterprises; enterprice competiveness Method; weight; holistic marking
 
 
版权所有:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部 
地 址:湖南省长沙市岳麓区麓山南路932号     邮编: 410083
电 话: 0731-88830141
电子邮箱: znsk@csu.edu.cn 湘ICP备09001153号-4