|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2011)01-0067-07 |
| |
|
对最高人民法院《关于审理政府信息公开行政案件
若干问题的规定(征求意见稿)》的评析 |
| |
王瑜 |
| |
|
（湘潭大学法学院，湖南湘潭，411105） |
| |
| 摘 要： 《政府信息公开条例》颁布施行一年半来，由于缺少配套的司法解释，其立法目的未能通过司法救济的途径得以保障有效实现。2009年11月2日，最高人民法院公布了《关于审理政府信息公开行政案件若干问题的规定(征求意见稿)》，明确了政府信息公开案件的受案范围；确定了政府信息公开行政诉讼的原告和被告范围；对政府信息做了区分，协调了《政府信息公开条例》与《档案法》的关系等。但其内容也存在被政府作为据以拒绝公开口实的可能、增加政府信息公开申请人成本、庭审方式不能满足新型案件的要求等问题；因此，增加政府举证责任，借鉴日本《信息公开法》所确立的“屏蔽审查原则”，在其中确立屏蔽审查程序等修改是必要的。 |
| |
| 关键词： 最高人民法院；政府信息；信息公开行政案件；屏蔽审查原则 |
| |
|
| |
Thoughts on “The Supreme People's Court's provisions of hear the government administrative cases of public information (draft)” |
| |
WANG Yu |
| |
（School of Law, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China） |
| |
| Abstract: “The regulations of public government information” promulgated one year and a half. Yet purpose couldn’t be realized by way of judicial relief due to the lack of supporting judicial interpretation. On November 2, 2009, the Supreme Court announced the provisions “public government information on the trial a number of administrative cases was issued (Hereinafter referred to as “Regulations”)”. Regulations "a clear case of government information disclosure scope of accepting cases; confirms that the information disclosure of the scope of the proceedings the plaintiff and defendant; to make a distinction between government information, coordination of the “Open Government Information” and “Archives Law”. This is opposed to the “Regulations on Open Government Information” and it is a step forward. But the “rule” elements exist by the government to refuse to release the handle, according to the possibility that information disclosure increases applicant’s costs, Judges in the case can not meet the new requirements and other issues. Therefore, it increases the burden of proof in government. While in Japan, “Information Disclosure Law” established “screening review of principles”. To establish procedures for screening review of the amendments in the “provision” is necessary. |
| |
Key words: the Supreme Court; government information; the case of information disclosure; Shield Review Principle |
| |
|
