|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2010)03-0064-05 |
| |
|
民事缺席判决制度溯源
——兼评缺席的正义 |
| |
刘秀明 |
| |
|
（西南科技大学法学院，四川绵阳，621010） |
| |
| 摘 要： 民事缺席判决制度历经了古希腊、古罗马和近现代的变迁过程。大陆法系国家的民事缺席判决制度强调庭审的缺席判决，近现代的英美法系国家创建了审前程序的缺席判决制度。庭审的缺席判决制度由传唤程序、审判程序和救济程序这前后衔接的三个主要阶段构成，每个阶段分别体现了程序参与权、公正程序请求权和法定庭审请求权。审前的缺席判决与对抗主义的诉讼模式和程序时效规则的严格遵守有着密切的联系。 |
| |
| 关键词： 缺席判决；民事诉讼；大陆法系；英美法系；程序正义 |
| |
|
| |
Source of default judgment system in civil procedure:
Concurrently comment on procedural justice of default |
| |
LIU Xiuming |
| |
（Law School, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Default judgment system in civil procedure experienced a transitional process of Ancient Greek, Ancient Rome and modern times. While trial default judgment is emphasized in some countries of civil law system, pre-trial default judgment is created in some countries of Anglo-American countries. Trial default judgment is composed of three stages of summons, judgment and remedy procedure, each of which embodies separately participation, claiming for obtaining fair procedure and right of trial. Pre-trial default judgment is closely connected with adversary procedure and litigated limitedness. |
| |
Key words: default judgment; civil procedure; continent system; Anglo-American system; procedural justice |
| |
|
