|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2007)04−0409−04 |
| |
|
当事人陈述证据价值之思考——以《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》为视角 |
| |
陈文曲 |
| |
|
（中南大学法学院, 湖南长沙, 410075） |
| |
| 摘 要： 2001年最高人民法院通过对民事诉讼证据规则的解释，对我国民事诉讼体制作出了重大的调整，从而对当事人陈述的证据地位产生了巨大的冲击。这一规则所确定的法律真实的证明标准、建立的自认制度逐步瓦解了当事人陈述作为证据存在之基础，且由于当事人陈述自身所难以克服的虚假性，决定了当事人陈述作为一种独立证据形式存在已经失去意义。 |
| |
| 关键词： 证据规则；当事人陈述；自认 |
| |
|
| |
On the value of the party’s statement——On《The supreme court’s some rules about the evidence in the civil procedure》 |
| |
CHEN Wenqu |
| |
（School of Law, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The supreme court adjusted the civil procedure system by the judicial interpretation to the rule of evidence in 2001, which impacted the status of the party’s statement. The legal truthfulness and the admission rule established by the rule of evidence overthrew the presence base of the party’s statement step by step, and for the mendacious of the party’s statement which is not able to conquer by itself, and the presence meaning of the party’s statement has forfeit. |
| |
Key words: the rule of evidence; the party’s statement; the rule of admission |
| |
|
