|
文章编号:1672-3104(2006)01-0103-04 |
|
《管子》中都四子本与南宋初浙刻本的比较 |
|
郭丽 |
|
(浙江大学人文学院,浙江杭州, 310028) |
|
摘 要: 明弘治七年朱东光刻印的中都四子本《管子》,系据刘绩《管子补注》翻刻。与南宋初绍兴年间刊印的浙江刻本相比较,四子本更注重用字的规范化和正规化;收录二十余条通行本没有的注解,是在原《管子注》的基础上做的修订与提高;用字能订正浙刻本及通行本的讹误;补充浙刻本没有的句子,使《管子》篇章更为完善;《四时》《霸言》《版法》篇章顺序与浙刻本有不同,后两篇以浙刻本顺序为是。四子本脱文、衍文、漏注情况比较严重,注解与浙刻
本亦有很大不同。清代学者王念孙、戴望均参考四子本以订正通行本。 |
|
关键词: 管子中都四子本;管子南宋初浙江刻本 |
|
|
|
Guanzi: a comparative analysis of Zhonglisizi edition with Nan Song Dynasty Zhejiang edition |
|
GUO Li |
|
(College of Humanities and Literature, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China) |
|
Abstract: In Ming Dynasty, in the seventh year of Hongzhi Emperor, Zhonglisizi edition was reprinted from Liuji s edition. It had different words with Zhejiang edition in Nan Song Dynasty. Zhonglisizi edition had kept old characters, supplied the missing words ofGuanziand had different orders too. But Zhonglisizi edition had many omitted sentences and superfluous words. It also had omitted some annotates. |
|
Key words: Zhonglisizi edition; Zhejiang edition in Nan Song Dynasty |
|
|
|