|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2026)01-0074-13 |
| |
|
涉外刑事诉讼程序的立法进路：体例、逻辑与技术 |
| |
郭志媛，丁鼎 |
| |
|
（中国政法大学刑事司法学院，北京，100088） |
| |
| 摘 要： 第四次刑事诉讼法的修改为涉外刑事诉讼程序入法提供了历史契机，而涉外刑事诉讼程序的构建反过来又会促进刑事诉讼法的法典化进程。随着我国对外开放的深化和外部法律风险的增加，涉外刑事诉讼程序应当以何种体例、逻辑和技术入法成为亟须回答的问题。在立法体例上，以刑事诉讼、民事诉讼和行政诉讼法域为参照，以程序特别理论和特别程序理论为支撑，应采取附随集中型下的独立成编模式；在逻辑机理上，应弥合我国现行立法与国际标准的脱节、消除刑事诉讼法与法外规范的龃龉、协调刑事诉讼法内部前后文的关系；在立法技术上，应采用纳入多元主体、适用联动修改、明确授权性条款具体内容、设置周延性规范留白地带的立法结构技术和立法语言技术。 |
| |
| 关键词： 涉外刑事诉讼；刑事诉讼法典化；特别程序；立法技术 |
| |
|
| |
Legislative approaches to foreign-related criminal procedure: Structure, logic and technique |
| |
GUO Zhiyuan, DING Ding |
| |
（College of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The fourth amendment of The Criminal Procedure Law provides a historical opportunity for the inclusion of foreign-related criminal procedure in the law, while the construction of foreign-related criminal procedure systems, in turn, affects the codification process of criminal procedure. With the deepening of China's opening-up policy and the increase of external legal risks, it has become an urgent question to answer how foreign-related criminal procedure should be incorporated in the law in terms of structure, logic and technique. In terms of legislative structure, with the legal domains of criminal procedure, civil procedure and administrative procedure as references, and with the theories of special procedure and procedural particularity as the support, an independent part should be added to The Criminal Procedure Law. In terms of logical mechanism, it is necessary to bridge the gap between current legislation in China and international standards, coordinate the conflicts between The Criminal Procedure Law and extralegal norms, and integrate the relationships between the preceding and subsequent parts of the criminal procedure code. In terms of legislative technique, it is necessary to adopt a technique with legislative structure and legislative language that incorporates multiple subjects, applies linked amendments, clarifies the specific contents of authorizing provisions, and leaves normative spaces for future legislations. |
| |
Key words: foreign-related criminal procedure; codification of criminal procedure; special procedure; legislative technique |
| |
|
|
