|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2025)06-0224-09 |
| |
|
文学的“长尾”：中国现当代文学中的“杂文学” |
| |
宫震，金宏宇 |
| |
|
（山东大学文学院，山东济南，250100；武汉大学文学院，湖北武汉，430072） |
| |
| 摘 要： 20世纪以来，人们对文学的定义主要受西方文艺理论的影响。相对中国古代的“文”而言，其概念逐渐窄化、纯化，这也导致了许多现当代文学中的“杂文学”文本被遮蔽、被忽视。如果说，“纯文学”是中国现当代文学“主身”，那么“杂文学”则是其“尾”。又因为“杂文学”的巨量实存，故而是一个“长尾”。“杂文学”与“纯文学”都具有一定的文学性，只不过程度上有差异。当然，“杂文学”有其本体特征，更加强调非虚构性和实用性，同时也兼具现实介入性、文学性和批评性这三种“杂性”或目的。就价值来看，对“杂文学”的研究不但有助于学界了解中国现当代文学的文献实况、历史环境及其与传统资源的关系，还提供了更加包容性的文类观念，弥补了文学批评和文学史著的结构性缺失。 |
| |
| 关键词： 长尾理论；“杂文学”；“纯文学”；文类观念 |
| |
|
| |
The “long tail” of literature: “Miscellaneous literature” in modern and contemporary Chinese literature |
| |
GONG Zhen, JIN Hongyu |
| |
（School of Literature, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China;
School of Literature, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Since the 20th century, people’s definition of literature has mainly been influenced by Western literary theory. Compared to ancient Chinese “literature”, its concept has gradually been narrowed and purified, which has also led to the fact that many “miscellaneous literature” texts in modern and contemporary literature have been obscured and ignored. If “pure literature” is the “main body” of Chinese mode, rn and contemporary literature, then “miscellaneous literature” is its “tail”. Due to the massive existence of ‘miscellaneous literature’, it is a ‘long tail’. Both “miscellaneous literature” and “pure literature” have a certain degree of literary quality, but there is a difference in degree. Of course, “miscellaneous literature” has its own ontological characteristics, emphasizing more on “non-fiction” and “practicality”, while also possessing such three “miscellaneous” kinds or purposes as reality intervention, literariness, and criticism. In terms of value, the study of “miscellaneous literature” not only helps us understand the literary reality, historical environment, and relationship with traditional resources of modern and contemporary Chinese literature, but also provides a more inclusive concept of literary genres, filling the structural gap in literary criticism and literary history. |
| |
Key words: long tail theory; “miscellaneous literature”; “pure literature”; literary concept |
| |
|
|
