|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2025)06-0107-15 |
| |
|
CPTPP竞争政策规则的中国因应 |
| |
孙晋1,2, 帕孜丽娅·玉苏甫2 |
| |
|
（1. 新疆大学法学院，新疆乌鲁木齐，830000；2. 武汉大学法学院，湖北武汉，430072） |
| |
| 摘 要： 在制度型开放成为国家战略的背景下，我国正积极推进加入CPTPP的进程。对接其竞争政策规则是我国加入CPTPP面临的主要障碍之一。在对接过程中，我国存在竞争政策透明度不足、执法程序公正性需进一步加强、竞争损害诉讼规则完备度不高等制度瓶颈。通过借鉴以日本、澳大利亚和英国为代表的CPTPP成员国在衔接竞争政策规则方面的实践经验，我国可以探索适合自身国情的改革路径。其中，增强竞争政策基础地位、提升政策透明度，优化程序设计、促进执法公正，完善竞争损害诉讼制度是突破当前瓶颈的三条主要路径。系统性的体制机制改革和调整，不仅能够促使我国竞争政策与国际高标准竞争规则接轨，还将为我国企业在更加公平透明的国际市场环境中开展竞争提供有力的制度保障。 |
| |
| 关键词： CPTPP；竞争政策；程序公正；政策透明度；私人诉权 |
| |
|
| |
China’s response to CPTPP competition policy |
| |
SUN Jin1,2, Paziliya Yusufu2 |
| |
（1. School of Law, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830000, China;
2. School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China） |
| |
| Abstract: In the background of the national systemic opening-up strategy, China is actively joining the CPTPP. Aligning with its competition policy rules is a key challenge. In the alignment process, China faces prominent institutional barriers, including insufficient competition policy transparency, a need to strengthen the fairness of enforcement procedures, and insufficiently comprehensive competition damage litigation rules. Drawing on the practical experience of CPTPP members like Japan, Australia, and the UK, China can explore a fitting reform path. And three main approaches are as follows: enhancing competition policy transparency to reinforce its foundational status, optimizing procedures to promote fair enforcement, and improving the competition damage litigation system. Systematic institutional reforms will not only facilitate the alignment of our competition policy with international competition rules, but also provide Chinese enterprises with robust institutional support for competing in a fairer and more transparent international market. |
| |
Key words: CPTPP; competition policy; procedural justice; transparency of policy; private enforcement |
| |
|
|
