|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2025)05-0194-11 |
| |
|
网络文学符号重构的互文性“污染”——《诗歌语言的革命》发表半个世纪后的符号图景 |
| |
禹建湘1，张浩翔1,2 |
| |
|
（1. 中南大学人文学院，湖南长沙，410012；
2. 利兹大学语言、文化与社会学院，利兹，LS2 9JT） |
| |
| 摘 要： 克里斯蒂娃《诗歌语言的革命》发表半个世纪以来，文本在符号的互动和流动中不断突破自身边界。随着互联网媒介发生迭代，网络文学在更具开放性的文本场域中实现了符号的快速互动，特别是生成式人工智能诞生以来的无限符号图景也印证了文本的“污染”重构与互文关系。克里斯蒂娃在《诗歌语言的革命》中设想的互文性“污染”符号重构是一种与绝对权威性“纯洁”相对立的流动理念，强调了文本中符号意义的对话。一方面，基于文本符号重构的“污染”，通过生成式人工智能进行内容输出和人类创作的差异性比较，可以发现互文的流动是一种机械式重复的对话。机器语言符号的简单“拼接”是无法实现符号重构过程中的艺术美韵，两种符号交互的模式会呈现出显著的美的差异。另一方面，克里斯蒂娃也曾预见性地提出了“必要的重复”。这种必要性对网络文学创作中互文的艺术审美提供了可供参循的范式，表明互动符号的文本之间并非是单向度的意义传递，新旧文本的符号矩阵会形成对能指和所指的新关联，从而在不同媒介中整体性的故事中产生新的文本符号意义，进一步拓展了文本的边界。 |
| |
| 关键词： 网络文学；互文理论；克里斯蒂娃；符号学；生成式人工智能 |
| |
|
| |
Intertextual “contamination” in the symbolic reconstruction of online literature: The symbolic landscape half a century after Revolution in Poetic Language |
| |
YU Jianxiang1, ZHANG Haoxiang1,2 |
| |
（1. School of Humanity, Central South University, Changsha 410012, China;
2. School of Languages, Cultures and Societies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK） |
| |
| Abstract: Since the publication of Julia Kristeva’s Revolution in Poetic Language half a century ago, texts have continuously transcended their own boundaries through the interaction and flow of signs. With the evolving iterations of internet media, online literature has enabled rapid interaction of signs within a more open textual space. Especially since the advent of GAI (generative artificial intelligence), an infinite landscape of symbols has emerged, attesting to the reconstruction and intertextual “contamination” of texts. In Revolution in Poetic Language, Kristeva envisions intertextual “contamination” as a reconstruction of signs that opposes the notion of “purity” and absolute authority. This vision emphasizes the dialogic nature of symbolic meanings within the text. On the one hand, the “contamination” based on the reconstruction of textual symbols allows for a comparative exploration between AI-generated content and human creativity. This highlights how the fluidity of intertextuality may result in a mechanically repetitive dialogue. The simplistic “juxtaposition” of linguistic signs fails to achieve the aesthetic resonance inherent in the symbolic reconstruction process, revealing a stark contrast in the beauty manifested by these two modes of symbolic interaction. On the other hand, Kristeva also presciently proposed the idea of “necessary repetition.” This necessity offers a paradigm for the aesthetic intertextuality in online literary creation. It shows that the relationship between interactive symbols is not unidirectional; rather, the symbolic matrices of old and new texts form new associations between signifiers and the signified. This process generates novel symbolic meanings within the integrated stories across various media, further extending the boundaries of the text. |
| |
Key words: online literature; intertextuality; Julia Kristeva; semiotics; GAI (generative artificial intelligence) |
| |
|
