|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2025)05-0141-14 |
| |
|
高位必然推动？数据管理机构的行政级别对政府公共数据开放水平的影响效应研究 |
| |
彭忠益1, 2，余丽智1, 2，钱家焕3 |
| |
|
（1. 中南大学公共管理学院，湖南长沙，410075；
2. 中南大学地方治理研究院，湖南长沙，410083；
3. 浙江大学公共管理学院，浙江杭州，310058） |
| |
| 摘 要： 随着数据要素成为数字经济深化发展的核心引擎，中国省级政府陆续成立数据管理机构以推动本地区数字经济、数字社会与数据治理的有序发展。高层级机构具有更强的合法性权威和资源调配优势，是经典科层制理论的基本假设，高行政级别的数据管理机构在推进政府公共数据开放中的高位推动效应仍有待检验。基于2017—2023年31个省级行政区的面板数据，探究其数据管理机构行政级别对公共数据开放水平的影响效应以及政府创新偏好在其中的调节作用。研究发现，高位推动效应显著，而政府创新偏好在其中产生反向变动的调节效应。然而，高位推动效应存在地理位置和权力中心距离的作用边界：东部地区数据管理机构的高位推动作用显著，而在中西部地区则不明显；远权力中心的数据管理机构的高位推动作用显著，而近权力中心的数据管理机构则不明显。 |
| |
| 关键词： 数据管理机构；高位推动；行政级别；公共数据开放；政府创新偏好 |
| |
|
| |
Is top-down promotion inevitable? A study on the impact effect of administrative ranks of data management agencies on the level of governments’ public data openness |
| |
PENG Zhongyi1, 2, YU Lizhi1, 2, QIAN Jiahuan3 |
| |
（1. School of Public Administration, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China;
2. Institute of Local Governance, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China;
3. School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China） |
| |
| Abstract: As data has become the core driver of the digital economy, provincial governments in China have established data management agencies to advance the smooth development of the local digital economy, digital society, and data governance. Higher-level institutions possess greater legitimate authority, and resource-coordination advantages constitute the basic assumptions of classical bureaucratic theory. Yet the top-down effect of provincial data management agencies at higher administrative levels on public data openness waits to be substantiated. Based on panel data from 31 provinces spanning 2017 to 2023, this study explores the impact of different administrative ranks of data management agencies on public data openness and examines the moderating role of government innovation preferences. The study finds that the top-down effect is significant, with government innovation preferences exerting a moderating effect in the opposite direction. However, the top-down effect is bounded by geographic location and distance from the political power center, with a significant role in eastern provinces rather than in central and western regions, and with a more pronounced effect for agencies located farther from the political center than for those in closer proximity. |
| |
Key words: data management agency; top-down effect; administrative levels; public data openness; government innovation preferences |
| |
|
|
