|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2025)05-0042-09 |
| |
|
景观拜物教的本质澄明与悖论超越 |
| |
杨楹1，彭飞2 |
| |
|
（1. 西南财经大学马克思主义学院，四川成都，611130；
2. 中山大学马克思主义学院，广东广州，510275） |
| |
| 摘 要： 在资本主义历史语境中生成的景观拜物教，成为商品拜物教的新形态。景观拜物教消解了人的主体性和批判性，进而导致意识形态控制的隐秘性。景观拜物教内具丰盛与匮乏、平等与特权、自由与控制、个性与自我迷失等一系列价值悖论，彰显出“物”宰制“人”的内在本质。基于景观拜物教对生活世界的全面侵袭，德波主张将“日常生活批判”推进到“日常生活革命”，以打破日常生活习惯来激发个体改变生活的自觉，从而完成对景观拜物教的超越。然而，德波“日常生活革命”的解放策略，始终处于自相矛盾的尴尬境地。鉴于此，对景观拜物教的批判与超越，不能停滞于文化审断或现象反思，而是必须回归现代生活语境，深度揭示景观拜物教的生成逻辑与价值实质，重新确立“人”的价值主体地位。 |
| |
| 关键词： 景观拜物教；商品拜物教；价值悖论；德波；日常生活；超越 |
| |
|
| |
The essential clarity and paradoxical transcendence of spectacle fetishism |
| |
YANG Ying1, PENG Fei2 |
| |
（1. School of Marxism, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China;
2. School of Marxism, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The spectacle fetishism generated in the historical context of capitalism has become a new form of commodity fetishism. Spectacle fetishism dissolves human subjectivity and criticality, and further leads to the secrecy of ideological control. Spectacle fetishism has a series of value paradoxes, such as abundance and scarcity, equality and privilege, freedom and control, individuality and self-loss, which highlight the inner nature of “object” dominating “the human”. Based on the comprehensive invasion of spectacle fetishism into the living world, Debord advocated that the “criticism of daily life” should be promoted to the “revolution of daily life”, so as to break the habits of daily life to stimulate the consciousness of individuals to change their lives, so as to complete the transcendence of spectacle fetishism. However, his emancipatory strategy of “revolution of daily life” has always been in an embarrassing situation of self-contradiction. In view of this, the criticism and transcendence of spectacle fetishism cannot stop at cultural judgment or phenomenon reflection, but must return to the context of modern life, deeply reveal the generative logic and value essence of spectacle fetishism, and re-establish the value subject status of “human”. |
| |
Key words: spectacle fetishism; commodity fetishism; value paradox; Debord; daily life; transcendence |
| |
|
|
