|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2024)06-0200-10 |
| |
|
全球分配正义论何以回应罗尔斯主义者的挑战：基于“世界体系论”的补充 |
| |
谢廷玉1，李义天2 |
| |
|
（1. 清华大学人文学院，北京，100084；
2. 清华大学马克思主义学院，北京，100084） |
| |
| 摘 要： 在罗尔斯主义者与全球分配正义论者的论辩中，全球分配正义论面临两个方面的挑战：一是关于“万民社会”中是否存在与“域内社会”的“基本结构”可类比的“背景结构”。罗尔斯及其辩护者均强调域内的“政治文化”而否认这种可比性。由此，他们认为没有理由将分配正义原则应用于全球。二是对于应以何种制度在全球层面落实分配正义原则，全球分配正义论者的设想也存在一些不足。对此，“世界体系论”的理论资源可以有效补充全球分配正义论，帮助其回应挑战：该理论有助于反驳罗尔斯主义者的“政治文化视角”，确认全球“背景结构”与域内社会基本结构的可类比性；同时，世界体系论变革“世界体系”的方案也可补充全球分配正义论者的制度设想，弥补其当前的不足。 |
| |
| 关键词： 分配正义；基本结构；政治文化；世界体系 |
| |
|
| |
How the proponents of global distributive justice responds to Rawlsian's challenge: A supplement from world-systems theory |
| |
XIE Tingyu1, LI Yitian2 |
| |
（1.Department of Philosophy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. School of Marxism, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China） |
| |
| Abstract: In the debate between the Rawlsians and the proponents of global distributive justice, global distributive justice faces two challenges. The first is whether there exists a "background structure" in the global world (world of peoples) which is comparable to the "basic structure" in the domestic society. Rawls and his followers emphasise the "political culture" of the domestic society while denying such a comparability. As a result, they see no reason in applying principles of distributive justice globally. Secondly, as to what institutions are needed for applying the principles of distributive justice globally, the proponents of global distributive justice have some inadequacy. In this regard, the proponents of global distributive justice can respond to these challenges better with the help from the world-systems theory. The world-systems theory can help to refute the Rawlsians' "political-culture perspective", thus confirming the comparability between the domestic "basic structure" and global "background structure". At the same time, world-systems theory's programme for transforming the "world-system" can supplement system assumption by the proponents of global distributive justice and make up for the current inadequacy. |
| |
Key words: distributive justice; basic structure; political culture; world-system |
| |
|
