|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2024)06-0012-11 |
| |
|
生命的驯顺与保存：福柯与斯蒂格勒技术观的思想分野 |
| |
姜凯宜1，于水2 |
| |
|
（1. 南京大学马克思主义学院，江苏南京，210023；
2. 南京农业大学公共管理学院，江苏南京，210095） |
| |
| 摘 要： 在当代欧美左翼思潮中，福柯奠定了以阐明技术与生命的关系为基础来反思现代资本主义的传统。他认为，技术话语体系以开展治理活动为名驯服生命，人类传承马克思主义社会批判传统的方式在于摆脱技术话语控制进行自主言说。相比福柯，斯蒂格勒更强调技术工具与技术语言的相互作用。他认为技术在人类历史中具有无可替代的保存记忆的功能，但技术在资本主义社会的无限加速使其原有功能失效，生命由此遭遇保存危机，因此，传承马克思主义的方式在于重新定位技术的历史功效。从福柯到斯蒂格勒，欧美左翼思潮在“技术—生命”叙事上形成了两种路径，体现出当下欧美左翼学者对马克思主义截然不同的解读方式。 |
| |
| 关键词： 福柯；斯蒂格勒；技术；生命；马克思主义 |
| |
|
| |
The taming and preservation of life: The intellectual divide between Foucault and Stigler's technical views |
| |
JIANG Kaiyi1, YU Shui2 |
| |
（1. School of Marxism, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China;
2. Department of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China） |
| |
| Abstract: In contemporary French left-wing thoughts, the narrative tradition of reflecting on modern capitalism based on clarifying the relationship between technology and life is rooted in Foucault. He believes that capital relies on technological discourse to tame life in the name of governance activities, and that only by breaking free from the control of technological discourse and speaking independently, can life inherit the Marxist tradition of social criticism in ideology. Compared to Foucault, Stigler emphasizes more on the interaction between technological tools and technological language. He contends that technology has an irreplaceable function in preserving memory in human history, and that the infinite acceleration of technology in capitalist society renders its original function ineffective, putting life at risk of preservation . Therefore, the way to inherit Marxism lies in repositioning the historical efficacy of technology. From Foucault to Stigler, the French left-wing movement has formed two paths in "the technology-life" narrative, reflecting the vastly different interpretations of Marxism by current left-wing scholars. |
| |
Key words: Foucault; Stiegler; technology; life; Marxism |
| |
|
|
