|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2023)01-0032-10 |
| |
|
论行政审判中平等原则审查基准的完善及适用 |
| |
林莉红，任沫蓉 |
| |
|
（武汉大学法学院，湖北武汉，430072） |
| |
| 摘 要： 平等原则是行政审判中审查行政行为实质合法性的标准之一。在平等诉求日滋月益的现实背景下，既有学理观点存在疏漏，实务上的审查基准不成体系，难以应对审判需求。同时，平等原则的广泛内涵也造成其在适用过程中存在司法权过度干涉行政权的风险。基于司法适配性和实践操作性的考量，平等原则在行政审判中的审查基准应采用双阶审查标准：第一阶段为条件审查，要求涉诉案件有适宜进行比照的参考依据；第二阶段为对比审查，法院应根据形式平等为主、实质平等为辅的适用原则，比照参考依据作出行政行为是否违反平等原则的认定。 |
| |
| 关键词： 行政审判；平等原则；形式平等；实质平等；实质合法 |
| |
|
| |
On the perfection and application of review criteria of the principle of equality in administrative trial |
| |
LIN Lihong, REN Morong |
| |
（School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China） |
| |
| Abstract: The principle of equality is one of the standards for reviewing the substantive legality of administrative acts in administrative trials. Under the realistic background of the growing demand for equality, the existing academic views which are defective and judicial practices which are not systematic are not enough to respond to the needs of the trial. Meanwhile, the extensive connotation of equality principle also causes the risk of judicial power interfering with administrative power excessively in the process of application. Based on the consideration of judicial adaptability and practical operability, a "two-step" review strategy should be adopted. The first step is the conditional review, which requires that the cases should have a suitable reference basis for comparison. The second step is comparative review. Based on the principle of formal equality as the mainstay and substantive equality as the supplement, the court should determine whether an administrative act violates the principle of equality by reference. |
| |
Key words: administrative trial; equality principle; formal equality; substantive equality; substantive legality |
| |
|
