|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2021)03-0026-14 |
| |
|
大数据竞争行为对我国反垄断执法的挑战与应对 |
| |
叶明，张洁 |
| |
|
（西南政法大学经济法学院，重庆，401120） |
| |
| 摘 要： 在数字经济时代，围绕数据的获取、使用、分析等展开的大数据竞争行为逐渐涌现。虽然大数据竞争行为具有激发市场竞争活力的积极效果，但也可能诱发垄断风险，因而引起反垄断关切。鉴于大数据竞争行为的主体具有企业与市场的二重性，手段依附于数据与算法的运用，后果较为复杂，其反垄断执法原则、执法工具、执法方式需要进行相应调整。具言之，在执法原则方面，矫正适用包容审慎原则，秉持积极的规制态度；在执法工具方面，围绕非价格竞争维度健全执法工具，并引入技术监管，培育“以技术规制技术”的意识与工具；在执法方式方面，注重运用以反垄断约谈为代表的柔性执法方式。 |
| |
| 关键词： 大数据竞争行为；反垄断执法；包容审慎；非价格竞争；反垄断约谈 |
| |
|
| |
Challenges of and response to big data competition to China's antitrust enforcement |
| |
YE Ming, ZHANG Jie |
| |
（School of Economic Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China） |
| |
| Abstract: In the digital economy era, big data competition around data acquisition, use, analysis, etc. is emerging. Although big data competition has the positive effect of stimulating the vitality of market competition, it can also induce monopoly risk and cause antitrust concern. In view that the subject of big data competition holds its duplicity in both the enterprise and the market, that its method depends on the use of big data and algorithm, and that its consequences are fairly complicated, its anti-monopoly law-enforcement principles, tools and ways need to be adjusted accordingly. To be more specific, in terms of law-enforcement principles, rectification should be tolerant, prudent and actively disciplined; in law-enforcement tools, we should revolve around non-price competition to maintain its perfection, introduce technology supervision and cultivate awareness and tools of regulating technology with technology; in law enforcement ways, we should focus on flexible ones represented by antimonopoly interview. |
| |
Key words: big data competition; antimonopoly enforcement; tolerance and prudence; non-price competition; antimonopoly interview |
| |
|
|
