 |
|
|
中南大学学报(社会科学版)
ZHONGNAN DAXUE XUEBAO(SHEHUI KEXUE BAN) |
2018年11月第24卷第6期
|
|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2018)06-0140-07 |
| |
|
迈向“共建共治共享”的中国社区治理 |
| |
李斌 |
| |
|
（中南大学社会学系，湖南长沙，410083） |
| |
| 摘 要： 尽管在学术领域，社区存在“实体”论与“虚无”论的概念争辩，但是在中国的实务领域，社区一直是行政管理单元。这客观上需要社区治理理论转向以社区行动为特色的干预主义。近二十年来中国社区存在“碎片化”发展的态势，针对此现象，党的十八大报告提出“党委领导、政府负责、社会协同、公众参与、法治保障”的治理体制，以纠正基层社区的碎片化现象。经过五年多的运行，尽管一些社区获得了一些典型经验，但总体来看，碎片化困境并没有改变。认为要落实党的十九大提出的“共建共治共享”社区治理目标，需要确定政府民政部门作为督察与执行机构，以落实相关社区治理任务。如此，社区治理的“社会化、法治化、智能化、专业化”目标才能够得以实现。 |
| |
| 关键词： 社区边界；碎片化；社区治理行动；社区治理机制；共建共治共享 |
| |
|
| |
Towards China's community governance of "Co-construction and Co-governance and Sharing" |
| |
LI bin |
| |
（Department of Sociology, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China） |
| |
| Abstract: In academia, there exist debates over the concepts between "community of entity" and "community of nothingness", but in China's practical field, the community has always been the real administrative unit. Such practice, therefore, needs the theory on community governance to turn to interventionism characterized by the community action. In the recent two decades, there has existed the development trend of fragmentation in China's community. To deal with such phenomenon of fragmentation at the level of grassroots community, the Report at the 18th National Congress proposed a social management featuring "Party committee leadership, government execution, social coordination, public participation and law guarantee". After more than five years' operation, although some typical experiences have been obtained in some communities, the overall dilemma has not been changed. The present study holds that, to implement the community governance objective of “Co-construction, Co-governance and Sharing” proposed by the 19th CPC National Congress Report, Civil Administration Departments must be empowered to act as executive agencies to work out the relevant tasks. Only in this way, can the objectives of "socialization, legalization, intellectualization and specialization" in community governance be achieved. |
| |
Key words: borderline; individual fragmentation; community governance mechanism; Co-construction and Co-governance and sharing |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
