|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2017)04-0085-08 |
| |
|
资源禀赋、资产性收益与产业扶贫——多案例比较研究 |
| |
梁琦1，蔡建刚1,2 |
| |
|
（1. 中山大学管理学院，广东广州，510275；2. 吉首大学旅游与管理工程学院，湖南吉首，416000） |
| |
| 摘 要： 确保贫困户的资产性收益是提升产业扶贫绩效的重要举措。通过构建一个包含产业类型、投资者类型和贫困户在内的理论框架，采用多案例研究的方法，对比研究产业扶贫的实施逻辑和要点。研究表明：贫困地区的资源禀赋型产业比市场需求型产业具有更高的扶贫绩效，内部投资者比外部投资者更具有脱贫减贫的倾向，而资产性收益的不同支付方式会产生较大的效用差异。对此，贫困地区政府首先要以资源禀赋为基础选择产业项目，其次要确保政府资金的合理应用，最后要营造良好的产业发展环境，从而提升产业扶贫实效。 |
| |
| 关键词： 资源禀赋；资产性收益；产业扶贫；多案例研究 |
| |
|
| |
Resources endowment, asset returns and industry poverty alleviation: A comparative study on many cases |
| |
LIANG Qi1, CAI Jiangang1,2 |
| |
（1. School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
2. Poverty Alleviation and Development Collaborative Innovation Center, Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Ensuring assets returns of the poor is an important measure to promote performance for poverty alleviation. By building a theoretical framework which includes industrial types, investor types and the poor, and by adopting the method of multi-case study, the present essay undertakes a comparative study of the logic and key points of implementing poverty alleviation. Research shows that the industry of resources endowment has a higher performance than the industry of market-driven in poor areas, that internal investors have a tendency to escape poverty reduction compared with outside investors, and that the different payment methods of asset returns will produce a large differences of utilities. So, the government in poor regions should first select industries based on the resources endowment, then ensure the proper use of government funds, and finally create a good environment for industrial development so as to promote effectiveness of poverty alleviation. |
| |
Key words: resources endowment; asset returns; industry poverty alleviation; study of many cases |
| |
|
|
