|
文章编号:1672-3104(2016)05-0033-07 |
|
知识产权法院审理中的先决问题研究 |
|
陈磊,李昌超 |
|
(西南政法大学法学院,重庆,401120;四川大学法学院,四川成都,610207) |
|
摘 要: 中国以往知识产权诉讼采司法二元模式,在案件同时涉及权利有效性与侵权损害赔偿争议时,存在严重的效率问题并可能导致矛盾判决。应直接采取两造诉讼,赋予知识产权民事诉讼对权利有效性判断的对世效力。应完善知识产权局诉讼参加制度,增加法院可依职权向其调取证据资料的规定,由同一法官审理并通过诉讼期日的指定,技术性地等待行政诉讼的结果,可一定程度上防止矛盾裁判。若发生矛盾判决,当事人可提再审之诉进行权利救济。专利侵权诉讼中专利权人提出修改申请时,法院可不等修改程序的结果,迳行依专利权的瑕疵或专利缩减的范围作出侵权与否的判决。 |
|
关键词: 知识产权诉讼;民事诉讼先决问题;专利有效性;专利侵权诉讼 |
|
|
|
Study on pre-adjudicated issues in court’s trial on intellectual property |
|
CHEN Lei, LI Changchao |
|
(School of Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China;
School of Law, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207, China) |
|
Abstract: Our courts have been adopting the judicial dualization model in the intellectual property litigation in the past. And there is a serious problem of efficiency and probably leads to contradictory judgments when the case involves the validity of the right and the dispute of compensation for infringement. It should be directly adopted by the parties to litigation, and the judgment of the validity of the right in the civil action of intellectual property should have effects beyond nothing. We need to improve the system of intellectual property authorities’ participation in the litigation, increase provisions that the court can collect evidence from the authority, hear the case by the same judge and specify the proceedings date, wait for the result of administrative litigation so as to avoid technically contradictory judgment to a certain extent. If contradictory judgment occurs, the parties can file a retrial lawsuit. When the patent holder puts forward a correcting application in the patent infringement litigation, the judge can make a decision whether it is an infringement or not in accordance with the scope of the patent right or the reduction of the patent, rather than waiting for the results of the correction process. |
|
Key words: intellectual property court; pre-adjudicated issues in intellectual property civil action; the validity of the patent; patent infringement litigation |
|
|