|
| 文章编号：1672-3104(2015)01-0257-06 |
| |
|
特征分析下存现句的非宾格性 |
| |
王永利1, 2，韩景泉3 |
| |
|
（1. 中南大学外国语学院，湖南长沙，410083；
2. 石家庄铁道大学外语系，河北石家庄，050043；
3. 广东外语外贸大学英语语言文化学院，广东广州，510420） |
| |
| 摘 要： 有学者以汉语存现句可允许非作格动词和及物动词为由质疑存现句的非宾格分析。在“述语分解模式”模式下利用特征分析，轻动词表现出两组区别特征：有界性特征[±TEL]和促发性特征[±INI]。述语内轻动词携带的[-INI] 特征被证明是非宾格述语的核心特征。依据这一诊断标准，所有的存现句都可以得到统一的解释。此分析对揭示非宾格结构的生成机制亦具有重要启示意义。 |
| |
| 关键词： 存现句；非宾格述语；述语分解；有界性特征[±TEL]；促发特征[±INI] |
| |
|
| |
A feature analysis of the unaccusativity of Chinese existentials |
| |
WANG Yongli1, 2, HAN Jingquan3 |
| |
（1. College of Foreign Languages, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China;
2. Department of Foreign Languages, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang 050043, China;
3. Faculty of English Language and Culture, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, China） |
| |
| Abstract: Some researchers challenge the unaccusative analysis of the Chinese existentials by arguing that existentials permit transitive or unergative verbs. Under the “Predicator Decomposition Mode”, two defining features are specified for the light verb: the telicity feature [±TEL] and initiation feature [±INI]. It is argued that the [-INI] feature carried by the light verb BE or BECOME is the fundamental feature of unaccusative predicator. By virtue of this diagnostic tool, all Chinese existentials can be universally explained as unaccusative structure. Meanwhile, the insight into the derivational mechanism of unaccusative structures can also be much advanced. |
| |
Key words: existentials; unaccusative predicator; predicator decomposition; [±TEL]; [±INI] |
| |
|
